2005 Mazda B3000 vs. 1964 BMW 3200 CS
To start off, 2005 Mazda B3000 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 BMW 3200 CS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 BMW 3200 CS would be higher. At 3,169 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 BMW 3200 CS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 BMW 3200 CS (160 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2005 Mazda B3000. (154 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 BMW 3200 CS should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda B3000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 52 kg more than 1964 BMW 3200 CS.
Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 240 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda B3000 | 1964 BMW 3200 CS | |
Make | Mazda | BMW |
Model | B3000 | 3200 CS |
Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 3169 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1552 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 75 L |