2005 Mazda B3000 vs. 2000 Volkswagen Beetle
To start off, 2005 Mazda B3000 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volkswagen Beetle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volkswagen Beetle would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Volkswagen Beetle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volkswagen Beetle (221 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2005 Mazda B3000. (154 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen Beetle should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda B3000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 156 kg more than 2000 Volkswagen Beetle.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volkswagen Beetle (320 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda B3000. (240 Nm). This means 2000 Volkswagen Beetle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda B3000.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda B3000 | 2000 Volkswagen Beetle | |
Make | Mazda | Volkswagen |
Model | B3000 | Beetle |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 3201 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 221 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 320 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 10.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1671 kg | 1515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 9.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 16.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 63 L |