2005 Mazda B3000 vs. 2003 MCC ForFour
To start off, 2005 Mazda B3000 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC ForFour. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC ForFour would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda B3000 (154 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2003 MCC ForFour. (93 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda B3000 should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC ForFour. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 701 kg more than 2003 MCC ForFour. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda B3000 (240 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC ForFour. (125 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda B3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC ForFour.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda B3000 | 2003 MCC ForFour | |
Make | Mazda | MCC |
Model | B3000 | ForFour |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1331 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 125 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1671 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 47 L |