2005 Mazda B3000 vs. 2004 Mazda 2
To start off, 2005 Mazda B3000 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda 2 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda B3000 (154 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 2. (74 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda B3000 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 358 kg more than 2004 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 240 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda B3000 | 2004 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | B3000 | 2 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1483 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 45 L |