2005 Mazda B3000 vs. 2004 Volvo S40
To start off, 2005 Mazda B3000 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Volvo S40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Volvo S40 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo S40 (170 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2005 Mazda B3000. (154 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda B3000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 416 kg more than 2004 Volvo S40.
Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 240 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda B3000 | 2004 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | B3000 | S40 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1671 kg | 1255 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 60 L |