2005 Mazda B3000 vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 154 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 546 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda B3000 (240 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (204 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda B3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mazda B3000 | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Mazda | Mazda |
| Model | B3000 | 3 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 2260 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 204 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1671 kg | 1125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 8.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 55 L |
