2005 Mazda B3000 vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E (268 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 2005 Mazda B3000. (154 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda B3000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 327 kg more than 2009 Mercedes-Benz E.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E (350 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda B3000. (240 Nm). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda B3000.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda B3000 | 2009 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | B3000 | E |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 350 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 92.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 88.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 18.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1552 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.2 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 14.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 80 L |