2005 Mazda B3000 vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda B3000 (154 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda B3000 should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 265 kg more than 2009 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda B3000 (240 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Clio. (151 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda B3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda B3000 | 2009 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | B3000 | Clio |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 151 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1483 kg | 1218 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 55 L |