2005 Mazda B3000 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando (174 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2005 Mazda B3000. (154 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda B3000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 71 kg more than 2010 Chevrolet Orlando.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda B3000 (240 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Chevrolet Orlando. (232 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda B3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Chevrolet Orlando.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mazda B3000 | 2010 Chevrolet Orlando | |
| Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
| Model | B3000 | Orlando |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 2384 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 174 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6700 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1671 kg | 1600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4652 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1836 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1633 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2760 mm |
