2005 Mazda B3000 vs. 2010 Jeep Patriot
To start off, 2010 Jeep Patriot is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Patriot (172 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2005 Mazda B3000. (154 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Patriot should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda B3000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 115 kg more than 2010 Jeep Patriot.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda B3000 (240 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Jeep Patriot. (223 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda B3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Jeep Patriot.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda B3000 | 2010 Jeep Patriot | |
Make | Mazda | Jeep |
Model | B3000 | Patriot |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 172 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 223 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1552 kg | 1437 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4409 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 51 L |