2005 Mazda B3000 vs. 2010 Mazda 5
To start off, 2010 Mazda 5 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda B3000 (154 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 5. (153 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda B3000 should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 93 kg more than 2010 Mazda 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda B3000 (240 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda 5. (200 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda B3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda B3000 | 2010 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | B3000 | 5 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 200 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1671 kg | 1578 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1753 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1631 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2751 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 60 L |