2005 Mazda B3000 vs. 2013 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2013 Ford Taurus is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Taurus (360 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 2005 Mazda B3000. (154 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda B3000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Taurus weights approximately 302 kg more than 2005 Mazda B3000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Taurus (475 Nm) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda B3000. (240 Nm). This means 2013 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda B3000.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda B3000 | 2013 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | B3000 | Taurus |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 360 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 475 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 10.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1671 kg | 1973 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 5154 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2177 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2868 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 72 L |