2005 Mazda B4000 vs. 1996 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Mazda B4000 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 4,029 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda B4000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda B4000 (207 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1996 Toyota 4Runner. (123 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda B4000 should accelerate faster than 1996 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 260 kg more than 2005 Mazda B4000.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda B4000 (310 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Toyota 4Runner. (295 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda B4000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda B4000 | 1996 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | B4000 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4029 cc | 2982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 295 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 21.2:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |