2005 Mazda B4000 vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, both 2005 Mazda B4000 and 2005 MCC Crossblade were released in the same year (2005). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 4,031 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda B4000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda B4000 (207 HP) has 137 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda B4000 should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda B4000 weights approximately 286 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Mazda B4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda B4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda B4000 (323 Nm) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda B4000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mazda B4000 | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Mazda | MCC |
| Model | B4000 | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 4031 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 207 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 323 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 744 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 1810 mm |
