2005 Mazda B4000 vs. 2008 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda B4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda B4000 would be higher. At 4,029 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda B4000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda B4000 weights approximately 5 kg more than 2008 Mercedes-Benz C.
Because 2005 Mazda B4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mercedes-Benz C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda B4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz C (370 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda B4000. (310 Nm). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda B4000.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda B4000 | 2008 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | B4000 | C |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4029 cc | 2685 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 310 Nm | 370 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 88.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1585 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 62 L |