2005 Mazda B4000 vs. 2010 Land Rover LR2
To start off, 2010 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda B4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda B4000 would be higher. At 4,031 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda B4000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Land Rover LR2 (230 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2005 Mazda B4000. (207 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover LR2 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda B4000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Land Rover LR2 weights approximately 900 kg more than 2005 Mazda B4000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda B4000 (323 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Land Rover LR2. (317 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda B4000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Land Rover LR2.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda B4000 | 2010 Land Rover LR2 | |
Make | Mazda | Land Rover |
Model | B4000 | LR2 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4031 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 323 Nm | 317 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4498 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1908 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2659 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 70 L |