2005 Mazda Carol vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2005 Mazda Carol is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Nissan Cedric (66 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2005 Mazda Carol. (45 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda Carol. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 690 kg more than 2005 Mazda Carol. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Nissan Cedric (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda Carol. (58 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1967 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda Carol.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mazda Carol | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | Carol | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 2164 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 45 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 58 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2700 mm |
