2005 Mazda Carol vs. 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 2005 Mazda Carol is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser would be higher. At 3,429 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser (97 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2005 Mazda Carol. (45 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda Carol.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser (226 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda Carol. (58 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda Carol.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mazda Carol | 1982 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | Carol | Land Cruiser |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 3429 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 45 HP | 97 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Torque | 58 Nm | 226 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 102 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 60.4 mm | 105 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1700 mm |
