2005 Mazda Drifter vs. 1966 Mercury Comet
To start off, 2005 Mazda Drifter is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 6,393 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Comet (267 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 2005 Mazda Drifter. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Comet should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda Drifter. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda Drifter weights approximately 230 kg more than 1966 Mercury Comet.
Because 2005 Mazda Drifter is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Mercury Comet. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Drifter will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Mercury Comet (546 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 301 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda Drifter. (245 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1966 Mercury Comet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda Drifter.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda Drifter | 1966 Mercury Comet | |
Make | Mazda | Mercury |
Model | Drifter | Comet |
Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 6393 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 267 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 546 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1360 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2950 mm |