2005 Mazda Drifter vs. 1982 Pontiac Firebird
To start off, 2005 Mazda Drifter is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Pontiac Firebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Pontiac Firebird would be higher. At 4,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Pontiac Firebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Pontiac Firebird (168 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2005 Mazda Drifter. (112 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Pontiac Firebird should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda Drifter.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Pontiac Firebird (338 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda Drifter. (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1982 Pontiac Firebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda Drifter.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda Drifter | 1982 Pontiac Firebird | |
Make | Mazda | Pontiac |
Model | Drifter | Firebird |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 4997 cc |
Horse Power | 112 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 257 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 60 L |