2005 Mazda Drifter vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 Mazda Drifter is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 2,606 cc, 2005 Mazda Drifter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda Drifter (100 HP) has 30 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Drifter should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda Drifter weights approximately 820 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Mazda Drifter is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Drifter will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda Drifter (206 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2005 Mazda Drifter will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda Drifter | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Mazda | MCC |
Model | Drifter | Crossblade |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 2606 cc | 599 cc |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 206 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 740 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 1810 mm |