2005 Mazda Drifter vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda Drifter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda Drifter would be higher. At 2,606 cc, 2005 Mazda Drifter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C30 weights approximately 106 kg more than 2005 Mazda Drifter.
Because 2005 Mazda Drifter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mazda Drifter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo C30 (400 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda Drifter. (206 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda Drifter.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda Drifter | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | Drifter | C30 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2606 cc | 2000 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 206 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1451 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 60 L |