2005 Mazda Etude vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2005 Mazda Etude is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,594 cc, 2005 Mazda Etude is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda Etude (99 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (57 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Etude should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda Etude weights approximately 130 kg more than 1967 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda Etude (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (94 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Mazda Etude will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mazda Etude | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Mazda | Riley |
| Model | Etude | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
| Engine Size | 1594 cc | 1275 cc |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 57 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 915 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2380 mm |
