2005 Mazda Marathon vs. 1947 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 2005 Mazda Marathon is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1947 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda Marathon (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1947 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Marathon should accelerate faster than 1947 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 113 kg more than 2005 Mazda Marathon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mazda Marathon | 1947 Volvo PV 60 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | Marathon | PV 60 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1947 |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3670 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1517 kg | 1630 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2850 mm |
