2005 Mazda Marathon vs. 1964 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2005 Mazda Marathon is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,260 cc, 2005 Mazda Marathon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda Marathon (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Marathon should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda Marathon weights approximately 432 kg more than 1964 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Nissan Cedric is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mazda Marathon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Nissan Cedric will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda Marathon (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2005 Mazda Marathon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda Marathon | 1964 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | Marathon | Cedric |
Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1488 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1517 kg | 1085 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2540 mm |