2005 Mazda Marathon vs. 1968 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2005 Mazda Marathon is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 2,260 cc, 2005 Mazda Marathon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda Marathon (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1968 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Marathon should accelerate faster than 1968 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda Marathon weights approximately 777 kg more than 1968 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda Marathon (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2005 Mazda Marathon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mazda Marathon | 1968 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Mazda | ZAZ |
| Model | Marathon | 966 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 887 cc |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 54.5 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 10 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1517 kg | 740 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2170 mm |
