2005 Mazda Marathon vs. 1969 Volvo 120
To start off, 2005 Mazda Marathon is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 2,260 cc, 2005 Mazda Marathon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda Marathon (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1969 Volvo 120. (81 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Marathon should accelerate faster than 1969 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda Marathon weights approximately 487 kg more than 1969 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda Marathon (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Volvo 120. (158 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2005 Mazda Marathon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mazda Marathon | 1969 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | Marathon | 120 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1986 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 80 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1517 kg | 1030 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 45 L |
