2005 Mazda Marathon vs. 1996 Proton 400
To start off, 2005 Mazda Marathon is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 400 would be higher. At 2,260 cc, 2005 Mazda Marathon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda Marathon (104 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1996 Proton 400. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Marathon should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda Marathon weights approximately 402 kg more than 1996 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Mazda Marathon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mazda Marathon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Proton 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda Marathon (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Proton 400. (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Mazda Marathon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda Marathon | 1996 Proton 400 | |
Make | Mazda | Proton |
Model | Marathon | 400 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 174 Nm | 123 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1517 kg | 1115 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2510 mm |