2005 Mazda Marathon vs. 2011 Audi A3
To start off, 2011 Audi A3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda Marathon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda Marathon would be higher. At 2,260 cc, 2005 Mazda Marathon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi A3 (123 HP) has 19 more horse power than 2005 Mazda Marathon. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda Marathon.
Because 2005 Mazda Marathon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mazda Marathon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Audi A3 has automatic transmission and 2005 Mazda Marathon has manual transmission. 2005 Mazda Marathon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Audi A3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda Marathon | 2011 Audi A3 | |
Make | Mazda | Audi |
Model | Marathon | A3 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1400 cc |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 123 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 10 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |