2005 Mazda MPV vs. 1996 Rover 220
To start off, 2005 Mazda MPV is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 220 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda MPV (200 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1996 Rover 220. (103 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda MPV weights approximately 497 kg more than 1996 Rover 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda MPV (271 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 220. (210 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 220.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda MPV | 1996 Rover 220 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | MPV | 220 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 210 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1711 kg | 1214 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.4 L/100km | 4.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 50 L |