2005 Mazda MPV vs. 1996 Rover 400
To start off, 2005 Mazda MPV is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 400 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda MPV (134 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1996 Rover 400. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 400.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda MPV (195 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda MPV | 1996 Rover 400 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | MPV | 400 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 195 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2560 mm |