2005 Mazda MPV vs. 2013 Dodge GRAND CARAVAN

To start off, 2013 Dodge GRAND CARAVAN is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Dodge GRAND CARAVAN is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge GRAND CARAVAN (279 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2005 Mazda MPV. (200 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge GRAND CARAVAN should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda MPV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge GRAND CARAVAN weights approximately 339 kg more than 2005 Mazda MPV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge GRAND CARAVAN (353 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda MPV. (271 Nm). This means 2013 Dodge GRAND CARAVAN will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda MPV.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Mazda MPV 2013 Dodge GRAND CARAVAN
Make Mazda Dodge
Model MPV GRAND CARAVAN
Year Released 2005 2013
Body Type Minivan Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2966 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 200 HP 279 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 271 Nm 353 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 7 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1711 kg 2050 kg
Vehicle Length 4820 mm 5151 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 2247 mm
Vehicle Height 1760 mm 1725 mm
Wheelbase Size 2850 mm 3078 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 9.4 L/100km 7.9 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 13.1 L/100km 12.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 76 L