2005 Mazda MX-5 Miata vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V

To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda MX-5 Miata. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda MX-5 Miata would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (548 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 410 more horse power than 2005 Mazda MX-5 Miata. (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda MX-5 Miata. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 828 kg more than 2005 Mazda MX-5 Miata. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (747 Nm) has 577 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda MX-5 Miata. (170 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda MX-5 Miata.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Mazda MX-5 Miata 2013 Cadillac CTS-V
Make Mazda Cadillac
Model MX-5 Miata CTS-V
Year Released 2005 2013
Body Type Convertible Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1835 cc 6200 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 138 HP 548 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6100 RPM
Torque 170 Nm 747 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 9.1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1085 kg 1913 kg
Vehicle Length 3950 mm 4788 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1884 mm
Vehicle Height 1230 mm 1422 mm
Wheelbase Size 2270 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Consumption 8.4 L/100km 12.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 10.2 L/100km 16.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 9.4 L/100km 14.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 48 L 68 L