2005 Mazda MX-Flexa vs. 1964 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Cedric.
Because 1964 Nissan Cedric is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Nissan Cedric will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda MX-Flexa | 1964 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | MX-Flexa | Cedric |
Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2540 mm |