2005 Mazda MX-Flexa vs. 1967 Mercury Comet

To start off, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 3,279 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1967 Mercury Comet. (119 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa should accelerate faster than 1967 Mercury Comet.

Because 1967 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Comet (258 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa. (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1967 Mercury Comet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Mazda MX-Flexa 1967 Mercury Comet
Make Mazda Mercury
Model MX-Flexa Comet
Year Released 2005 1967
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2261 cc 3279 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 158 HP 119 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 4400 RPM
Torque 207 Nm 258 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87.5 mm 103 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 5000 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1660 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2950 mm