2005 Mazda MX-Flexa vs. 1999 Mercury Grand Marquis
To start off, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mercury Grand Marquis. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mercury Grand Marquis would be higher. At 4,598 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Mercury Grand Marquis is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1999 Mercury Grand Marquis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Mercury Grand Marquis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mercury Grand Marquis (373 Nm) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa. (207 Nm). This means 1999 Mercury Grand Marquis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda MX-Flexa | 1999 Mercury Grand Marquis | |
Make | Mazda | Mercury |
Model | MX-Flexa | Grand Marquis |
Year Released | 2005 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 4598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 207 Nm | 373 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2710 mm |