2005 Mazda MX-Flexa vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,555 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa. (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa.
Because 2004 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 315 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa. (207 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mazda MX-Flexa | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | MX-Flexa | Armada |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2261 cc | 5555 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 207 Nm | 522 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 98 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 2010 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3160 mm |
