2005 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1952 Talbot Saoutchik
To start off, 2005 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Saoutchik would be higher. At 4,480 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Saoutchik is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda RX-8 (197 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. (169 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Talbot Saoutchik weights approximately 415 kg more than 2005 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Mazda RX-8 has automatic transmission and 1952 Talbot Saoutchik has manual transmission. 1952 Talbot Saoutchik will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Mazda RX-8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mazda RX-8 | 1952 Talbot Saoutchik | |
| Make | Mazda | Talbot |
| Model | RX-8 | Saoutchik |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 1311 cc | 4480 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 169 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 1800 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3160 mm |
