2005 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1965 Steyr 650T
To start off, 2005 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Steyr 650T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Steyr 650T would be higher. At 1,308 cc, 2005 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda RX-8 (189 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1965 Steyr 650T. (20 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1965 Steyr 650T. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 856 kg more than 1965 Steyr 650T. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda RX-8 (220 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Steyr 650T. (40 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2005 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Steyr 650T.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda RX-8 | 1965 Steyr 650T | |
Make | Mazda | Steyr |
Model | RX-8 | 650T |
Year Released | 2005 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1308 cc | 643 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 20 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 40 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1356 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 2970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1330 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 1850 mm |