2005 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1983 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 2005 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Plymouth Reliant is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Plymouth Reliant weights approximately 85 kg more than 2005 Mazda RX-8.
Because 2005 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mazda RX-8 | 1983 Plymouth Reliant | |
| Make | Mazda | Plymouth |
| Model | RX-8 | Reliant |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1308 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1150 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2260 mm |
