2005 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1986 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2005 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda RX-8 (228 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1986 Chevrolet Astro. (183 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1986 Chevrolet Astro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 830 kg more than 2005 Mazda RX-8.
Because 1986 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chevrolet Astro (338 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda RX-8. (211 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1986 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mazda RX-8 | 1986 Chevrolet Astro | |
| Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
| Model | RX-8 | Astro |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1986 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1308 cc | 4293 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 183 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 211 Nm | 338 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1895 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2830 mm |
