2005 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 2005 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 MCC Smart would be higher. At 1,308 cc, 2005 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda RX-8 (228 HP) has 175 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 415 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mazda RX-8 | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Mazda | MCC |
| Model | RX-8 | Smart |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1308 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 53 HP |
| Top Speed | 235 km/hour | 129 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 650 kg |
