2005 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1999 Acura CL
To start off, 2005 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Acura CL would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Acura CL (200 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2005 Mazda RX-8. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda RX-8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Acura CL weights approximately 195 kg more than 2005 Mazda RX-8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mazda RX-8 | 1999 Acura CL | |
| Make | Mazda | Acura |
| Model | RX-8 | CL |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1311 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 200 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4826 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1781 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1389 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2715 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 65 L |
