2005 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2003 Opel Vectra
To start off, 2005 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Opel Vectra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Opel Vectra would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Opel Vectra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda RX-8 (228 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2003 Opel Vectra. (175 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2003 Opel Vectra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Opel Vectra weights approximately 435 kg more than 2005 Mazda RX-8.
Because 2005 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Opel Vectra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Opel Vectra (270 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda RX-8. (211 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2003 Opel Vectra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda RX-8 | 2003 Opel Vectra | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | RX-8 | Vectra |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1308 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 211 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1500 kg |