2005 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2010 Opel Zafira
To start off, 2010 Opel Zafira is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Opel Zafira is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Opel Zafira (238 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2005 Mazda RX-8. (228 HP @ 8200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Opel Zafira should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda RX-8.
Because 2005 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Opel Zafira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Opel Zafira (320 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda RX-8. (211 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2010 Opel Zafira will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda RX-8 | 2010 Opel Zafira | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | RX-8 | Zafira |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1308 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 211 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 58 L |