2005 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2010 Renault Fluence
To start off, 2010 Renault Fluence is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Fluence is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda RX-8 (228 HP) has 118 more horse power than 2010 Renault Fluence. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Fluence. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Fluence weights approximately 160 kg more than 2005 Mazda RX-8.
Because 2005 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Fluence, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Renault Fluence has automatic transmission and 2005 Mazda RX-8 has manual transmission. 2005 Mazda RX-8 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Renault Fluence will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda RX-8 | 2010 Renault Fluence | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | RX-8 | Fluence |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1308 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 110 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1225 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2702 mm |