2005 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara

To start off, 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. At 2,393 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda RX-8 (197 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara. (166 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara weights approximately 188 kg more than 2005 Mazda RX-8.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda RX-8 (222 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara. (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara. 2005 Mazda RX-8 has automatic transmission and 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara has manual transmission. 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Mazda RX-8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Mazda RX-8 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara
Make Mazda Suzuki
Model RX-8 Grand Vitara
Year Released 2005 2012
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1311 cc 2393 cc
Engine Type dual-disk rotary in-line
Horse Power 197 HP 166 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 222 Nm 219 Nm
Torque RPM 5500 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1385 kg 1573 kg
Vehicle Length 4430 mm 4300 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1695 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2640 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 10 L/100km 9 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 13.2 L/100km 12.4 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 66 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]