2005 Mazda Tribute vs. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 2005 Mazda Tribute is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 236 kg more than 2005 Mazda Tribute.
Because 2005 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mazda Tribute | 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
| Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Tribute | Starfire |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 6965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1584 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3130 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 60 L |
