2005 Mazda Tribute vs. 1981 Volvo 240
To start off, 2005 Mazda Tribute is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,127 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda Tribute (129 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1981 Volvo 240. (96 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1981 Volvo 240.
Because 2005 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Volvo 240. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda Tribute (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Volvo 240. (127 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda Tribute | 1981 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | Tribute | 240 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 181 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2660 mm |