2005 Mazda Tribute vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Mazda Tribute is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 66 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2005 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda Tribute | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
Model | Tribute | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1546 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2760 mm |